Questions Linger About Enforcement of California AB 5 Law

American Trucking Associations General Counsel Richard Pianka Unaware of Any Enforcement Against Companies

Traffic in California
Traffic travels on Interstate 80 in Richmond, Calif. (David Paul Morris/Bloomberg News)

[Stay on top of transportation news: .]

The California AB 5 independent contractor law is more than 4 years old, but how and to what extent it鈥檚 being enforced across the trucking industry remains an open question.

The law has been mired for years in legal challenges led by the , the most recent of which was rejected by an appeals court. While CTA is weighing next steps, industry observers say the outlook for practical application of the law remains muddy.

鈥淚鈥檓 not aware of any state enforcement against any companies,鈥 said , 鈥 general counsel. 鈥淏ut it鈥檚 a big old world, and I would not want to say that there hasn鈥檛 been. It could be that the state is waiting until this litigation has played out before it went down the path of enforcement.鈥

In January of last year, CTA asked federal district Judge Roger Benitez to temporarily block enforcement of the law that it said 鈥渆ffectively eliminates owner-operators from any role in motor transport in California.鈥 However, Benitez in a March 15 ruling denied the request and said the AB 5 law 鈥渄oes not run afoul of federal statute.鈥 That request for review came after a federal appellate court rejected an earlier CTA attempt to stop enforcement of AB 5, as well as the U.S. Supreme Court鈥檚 refusal to hear the case.



Image
Rich Pianka

笔颈补苍办补听

In its legal filings, CTA has claimed that the law鈥檚 three-pronged 鈥淎BC鈥 test for worker status determination cannot be enforced against the trucking industry. The B-prong requires that an individual 鈥 an owner-operator as it relates to trucking 鈥 is customarily engaged in an independently established business. CTA has argued that AB 5 will force owner-operators to become motor carrier employees.

There are indications that state officials could at some point pursue legal actions or initiate audits against motor carriers for misclassifying independent operators. Prosecutors already have pursued legal actions against Uber and Lyft for misclassification, but so far there are no reports of action against truckers.

鈥淲e have seen no evidence of audit enforcement, such as might occur with the state鈥檚 Division of Labor Standards Enforcement,鈥 said Gregory Feary, managing partner of the Indianapolis-based trucking law firm of Scopelitis Garvin Light Hanson & Feary. 鈥淭hat鈥檚 where you would likely see some type of audit enforcement.鈥

ABC Test

The three-pronged ABC test dictates that a worker is considered an independent contractor to whom a wage order does not apply only if the hiring agency establishes:

鈻 (A) That the worker is free from the control and direction of the hirer in connection with the performance of work, both under the contract for the performance of such work and in fact.
鈻 (B) That the worker performs work that is outside the usual course of the hiring entity鈥檚 business.
鈻 (C) That the worker is customarily engaged in an independently established trade, occupation or business of the same nature as the work performed for the hiring entity.

He also noted there is some room for interpretation of AB 5.

鈥淭here鈥檚 no law that says you have to voluntarily subject yourself to either the ABC test or the [business-to-business] exemption to determine where you stand 鈥 or self report,鈥 he said. The AB 5 B-to-B exemption allows providers who are established as a 鈥渟ole proprietorship, partnership, limited liability company, limited liability partnership or corporation鈥 to enter a contractual arrangement with a business. However, a business must meet 10 requirements to claim the exemption.

鈥淚t is prudent to detect where you might land if there is an audit, or if there was some type of a litigation action,鈥 Feary said. 鈥淐ertainly many motor carriers are asking that question. But the law doesn鈥檛 require them to take [the ABC test].鈥

Image
Todd Spencer

厂辫别苍肠别谤听

鈥淲e鈥檙e not aware of any enforcement activity related to this,鈥 said Todd Spencer, president of the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association, which joined CTA in the recent legal challenge. 鈥淓arly on, enforcement was set aside by the courts. Since then, we have not heard anything.

He added, 鈥淐alifornia has been really, really frustrating in that since passage of this legislation some four years ago, we struggle to get anybody within the state to tell us how you comply. That鈥檚 still a quandary that we have.鈥

For its part, the state is happy that the law has withstood legal scrutiny.

Image
Rob Bonta

叠辞苍迟补听

鈥淲e鈥檙e pleased that the district court got this one right and upheld AB 5鈥檚 protections,鈥 California Attorney General Rob Bonta said in response to the March 15 ruling. 鈥淭his attempt to invalidate the application of AB 5 to the trucking industry will not stand. The California Department of Justice will continue to defend this important law and stand up for the rights of workers to receive the benefits and protections to which they are legally entitled.鈥

In July 2022, more than 70 trade associations representing wide-ranging supply chain interests sent a letter to California Gov. Gavin Newsom asking him to issue an executive order to temporarily pause enforcement of the state鈥檚 AB 5 contractor law. The letter, signed by trade organizations 鈥 including ATA 鈥 representing interests ranging from trucking and retail to agriculture and business, also asked Newsom, a Democrat, to immediately call labor and industry to the table 鈥渢o negotiate a path forward to preserve small business trucking in the state of California and prevent further disruptions to the supply chain.鈥

鈥淓xperienced drivers, such as the typical owner-operator, are in high demand and could easily secure employment as company drivers,鈥 the letter said. 鈥淗owever, owner-operators are independent by choice for reasons related to freedom, flexibility and economic opportunity.鈥

Trending

Newsletter Signup

Subscribe to Transport Topics

 

Hot Topics