Washington Supreme Court Finds State Not at Fault for Skagit River Bridge Collapse

Collapsed Skagit River Bridge 2013
A worker looks at the collapsed portion of the Interstate 5 bridge at the Skagit River on May 24, 2013. (Elaine Thompson/AP)

[Stay on top of transportation news: .]

The Supreme Court of Washington has determined the Washington Department of Transportation cannot be held at fault for an interstate bridge collapse that occurred in 2013.

The court鈥檚 opinion, filed Oct. 31, found 鈥渘o fault may be allocated to the state.鈥

The incident took place when William Scott, a driver for Mullen Trucking Corp., was transporting an oversize load across the Skagit River Bridge when his vehicle struck 11 of the structure鈥檚 sway braces, causing a portion of the bridge to collapse into the river. Two other vehicles fell into the water, but there were no fatalities. Three people were treated for minor injuries.



The Skagit River Bridge carries Interstate 5 in Burlington, Wash., some 50 miles south of the Canadian border.

Scott was driving in the right lane when the incident occurred. The bridge鈥檚 vertical clearance varied, allowing more vertical capacity in the center than at the edge. The court document indicates that, if Scott had been driving in the left lane, his truck would have cleared the bridge.

On the bridge, a Motorways Transport truck driven by Amandeep Sidhu was 鈥渉alfway beside鈥 Scott on his left, limiting Scott to the right side of the structure. Motorways Transport is a Canadian trucking company based in British Columbia. Scott coasted to the end of the bridge, understanding what had occurred only when he looked back and saw the damage. Sidhu did not stop and said he didn鈥檛 know what had occurred.

鈥淭he investigation team determined the proximate cause of this collision sequence was directly attributable to Scott鈥檚 negligence,鈥 the court document states.

Scott鈥檚 truck was preceded by a pilot vehicle, which was outfitted with a clearance pole to help gauge whether height-restricted structures could accommodate the truck. Tammy Detray, who operated the pilot vehicle, was talking on a hands-free cellphone during the crossing and stated the pole did not strike the bridge, although that account was contradicted by a witness.

鈥淒etray was only 4.12 seconds ahead of Scott,鈥 the court document states. 鈥淎ccording to experts, even if Detray had alerted Scott to a clearance issue, Scott was too close to alter his path.鈥

Scott was cited for negligent driving. The state sued Scott, Mullen Trucking, Motorways Transport and other parties for $17 million for negligence. The trucking companies counterclaimed, saying the state also was negligent. Their claims were based on multiple grounds, such as the state鈥檚 duty to maintain bridges and the fact that the bridge had been deemed 鈥渇unctionally obsolete,鈥 meaning it was built according to standards that are no longer in practice today.

In a dissenting opinion, Justice Charles Wiggins said the state still may be allocated fault for failing to maintain its roads and bridges.

Phil Talmadge, an attorney representing Washington Trucking Associations, said the court鈥檚 decision exemplifies the need for legislative action to ensure the state is held responsible for negligence regarding bridges.

鈥淭here should be no special treatment of the state or its political subdivisions,鈥 Talmadge said.

Image

Petrich

WSDOT spokeswoman Andrea Petrich said, once the state Supreme Court decision becomes final, the case will return to the Skagit County Superior Court.

鈥淎ffirming the decision of two lower courts, the Supreme Court held WSDOT fulfilled all of its statutory obligations with respect to the bridge and is not responsible for paying any part of the more than $17 million it took to repair the bridge,鈥 Petrich said. 鈥淪everal of the defendants already have admitted their actions caused the bridge collapse. Nevertheless, they still have not paid any portion of the more than $17 million in repair costs they admit the state appropriately expended to repair the bridge.鈥

Washington鈥檚 bridges received a C+ on the American Society of Civil Engineers鈥 infrastructure report card, which was issued in January.

Mullen Group Ltd., based in Alberta, Canada, ranks No. 53 on the Transport Topics Top 100 list of the largest for-hire carriers in North America.

Want more news? Listen to today's daily briefing: