Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
Driverless Carmakers Are Pivoting to Trucks

[Stay on top of transportation news: .]
, and , all industry veterans and former leaders of the Pittsburgh robotaxi company Argo AI, are some of the brightest minds in autonomous vehicle development.
Their pivot from self-driving cars to self-driving trucks is the latest sign of how difficult it is to fully take our hands off the wheel, industry experts and researchers said.
鈥淚t is becoming more and more evident that automating trucks and transportation on highways is a more realistic goal for AVs than solving the general urban traffic automation problem,鈥 said , senior scientist at and the .
Nearly two decades after another CMU professor, , built an autonomous Hummer that drove itself 132 miles across the Mojave Desert, mass implementation of self-driving cars remains a distant goal. Experts blame safety, business economics and technological complexity for the delay.
In the meantime, they say it makes sense for pioneers to pursue the most promising business ventures as a means of continuing development.
Who's Who in the Autonomous Space
鈻Overview of Self-Driving Truck Development
Company Sketches
Click the links to jump to profiles听of autonomous companies.
Aurora | Waymo | TuSimple | Gatik | Locomation | 91视频 | Waabi | Einride | Plus | Embark | Kodiak Robotics | Robotic Research | Outrider | Pronto
On Sept. 7, Salesky and his team announced the launch of driverless truck company , which has already secured an investment from Japanese tech conglomerate , said to be at least $1 billion, according to Matt Smith, chief growth officer at the Allegheny Conference on Community Development. The startup follows in the footsteps of two other Pittsburgh-based driverless truck startups: Aurora, worth $2 billion last year, and Locomation, which shuttered earlier this year with only a couple of trucks tested in the region.
Softbank鈥檚 backing gives Stack AV more of a fighting chance than Locomation, said , associate professor of electrical and computer engineering at CMU. But it鈥檚 unclear whether the advancements in trucking will bleed over into car technology.
鈥淚t depends who you ask,鈥 Koopman said. 鈥淔or a while, the claim was that software could be shared between the two.鈥
Experts describe the trucking industry as ripe for autonomy: An existing shortage of about 78,000 drivers is set to double by 2031, according to , while continuing e-commerce growth is increasing the demand for truck-based shipping.
Softbank may have a closer view of the situation than most: Japan is confronting its own logistical delays as a series of pro-worker regulations known as the 鈥2024 problem鈥 compound an existing truck driver shortage.
鈥淭he business case for making money with trucking is more straightforward,鈥 Koopman said. 鈥淵ou can book in advance; there鈥檚 more dollars per ride involved.鈥
Trucking has a higher cost per driver compared to robotaxis and an existing supply chain of potential customers. The routes are consistent and replicable. But the model is still relatively untested from a commercial standpoint.
鈥淚 don鈥檛 know how they鈥檙e going to make money,鈥 Koopman said.
, Google鈥檚 AV spinoff that Salesky helped develop, shut down its trucking program in July to focus on robotaxis, which it described as a more viable route to commercial success.
Aurora, Pittsburgh鈥檚 other driverless truck company, is set for a commercial launch next year after already demonstrating that it can remove the driver from trucks driving between Dallas and Houston. The company has said its software could eventually carry over to cars.

An Aurora autonomous semi tractor-trailer pulls through a sensor calibration area at Aurora's facility in Palmer, Texas. (Tom Fox/The Dallas Morning News/TNS)
Through a partnership with Toyota, Aurora is testing a small fleet of driverless Sienna minivans in Pittsburgh and Texas that employ a similar computer 鈥渄river鈥 that includes real-time perception, mapping and control.
Stack AV has not formally announced plans to apply its technology to cars, though Salesky did describe trucking as 鈥渁 good entry point鈥 for autonomous vehicles in an interview with TechCrunch.
His team has deep experience in driverless cars, including from thousands of street tests carried out on Pittsburgh streets.
While some of that intellectual property was likely lost to the automakers that disbanded Argo, a trove of Argoverse data is still available online at CMU鈥檚 Center for Autonomous Vehicle Research. The center was previously named after Argo and created with a $15 million commitment from the startup in 2019.
Losing out on the visual indicator of futuristic cars navigating Pittsburgh鈥檚 streets doesn鈥檛 mean that the region is losing its entrepreneurial prowess, said Audrey Russo, CEO of the Pittsburgh Technology Council.
鈥淣ot everyone here gets to work on products that are seen right in front of our faces. I actually appreciate the fact that their products will be in other places because I think that helps Pittsburgh,鈥 she said. 鈥淭hat helps tell a richer story.鈥
And experts say Pittsburgh 鈥 with its dense and complicated infrastructure, featuring brick, cobblestone and even wooden roads 鈥 was always an ambitious place to test driverless technology.
鈥淧eople think San Francisco is bad 鈥 Pittsburgh says 鈥榟old my beer,鈥 鈥 Koopman said.
It would be unlikely to see another taxi fleet pop up here anytime soon, said , the former CEO of Locomation, given the costs associated with building and maintaining the vehicles.

A Locomation third-gen test vehicle. The company closed earlier this year. (Locomation)
鈥淧articularly for Pittsburgh, it鈥檚 as much of a business decision as a technical decision,鈥 he said.
Argo was launched during a period of 鈥渙ptimism鈥 and 鈥減eer pressure鈥 that pushed startups to spend more and move faster than they might have otherwise, Meri莽li said.
鈥淭his is one of the beauties of being in high tech,鈥 he said. 鈥淪ometimes things work, other times they turn out to be much more challenging than you can anticipate. We now know infinitely more than we did about the possibilities and challenges.鈥
Driverless trucking technology has 鈥渓ifesaving potential,鈥 Salesky told Bloomberg the day of Stack AV鈥檚 announcement, echoing claims he and other AV manufacturers have made for years.
Computer drivers don鈥檛 get tired or distracted. They can be trained on government-created crash models. And for trucks, the routes are even more replicable.
But the consequences of a single failure are also much greater.
鈥淧eople will say it鈥檚 simpler and easier,鈥 Koopman said. 鈥淚 don鈥檛 think that鈥檚 strictly true. It鈥檚 not as chaotic, but the stakes are way higher.鈥
The researcher said he鈥檚 been impressed by Salesky鈥檚 commitment to safety to date.
鈥淭heir track record is: This is very complicated, very hard. We want to take the time to do it right.鈥
Experts say a commitment to safety will be a key part of future regulatory approvals and positive public perception.
Under Rander鈥檚 leadership, Uber鈥檚 robotaxi unit struggled to regain momentum after a high-profile fatal crash in Arizona in 2018.
More recently, Cruise has had to answer for testing problems in San Francisco, which prompted outrage on social media and at municipal meetings. That backlash is 鈥渟ensationalized鈥 and overblown, Cruise CEO Kyle Vogt told the Washington Post the same day as Stack AV鈥檚 announcement.
Last year, and Argo鈥檚 teams helped to convince Pennsylvania lawmakers to approve the driverless bill, which allows testing on public roadways.
That doesn鈥檛 mean the companies have proven their tools are safe.
鈥淭he safety problem is receiving a lot of attention in autonomous driving, but so far a definitive solution has not emerged,鈥 said , a principal scientist at the CMU Center for Autonomous Vehicle Research. The problem is especially acute for trucks given their size and momentum and the damage they can cause in accidents, he said.
Meri莽li of Locomation, said it鈥檚 鈥渧ery prudent鈥 for Stack AV to start with trucks.
鈥淲hen we were starting we were pretty skeptical and unconvinced about the unit economics of robotaxis. Even if you could solve the technology, how long would it take to bring the cost down?鈥 he said.
And solving the technology was never a given. A fully autonomous car is the 鈥渉oly grail,鈥 of AV engineering, Meri莽li said.
That鈥檚 part of why he pivoted to his own development to focus on supply chains.
Want more news? Listen to today's daily briefing above or go here for more info
Mericli is now leading , an autonomous forklift startup headquartered in Pittsburgh with offices in Turkey. The lifts will operate more safely and efficiently than human operators and will help alleviate a workforce shortage in the palletized storage industry, Mericli said.
鈥淯nlike trucks, they are confined within four walls, but they are just as pivotal a transformation,鈥 he said.
A former postdoctoral fellow at CMU, Mericli described Stack AV鈥檚 founders as brilliant innovators and close friends.
鈥淭hey鈥檙e wonderful people and one of the best-suited teams to tackle this problem. I鈥檓 clapping as hard as I can for their success.鈥 Mericli said. 鈥淗opefully we will fix the issues of the supply chain from cover to cover.鈥
Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC